This appeared in today's The Sunday Guardian.
Intrepid
seekers. Naïve ingénues. And cynical hacks. In fiction, journalists generally
fall into one of those categories, more often than not, the last one. Thus, the
tone of novels about the newsroom is usually farcical, following the example
set by Evelyn Waugh’s Scoop. Such was
the case, for example, in Michael Frayn’s Towards
the End of the Morning, set in the dying years of Fleet Street. Last year, though, there was Tom Rachman’s The Imperfectionists, an affectionate,
nostalgic look at the staff of a struggling newspaper in Rome. That daily
wasn’t bothered with setting up a website because, as one of the senior
staffers put it, “The Internet is to news what car horns are to music.” It’s
hard to think of anyone feeling that way nowadays.
A
similar sentiment is voiced by one of the journalists in The Spoiler, a recent debut novel by Annalena McAfee. McAfee’s
background is suited to such an enterprise – she’s had over three decades of
experience as a journalist, the last six years at The Guardian’s Saturday Review supplement, which she helped set up.
(By the way, the novel is dedicated to her husband, a certain Ian McEwan.)
Set
in the London of the late Nineties, The
Spoiler revolves around the past and future of news reporting, shifting
between the points of view of the two central characters. First, there’s the
80-year-old Honor Tait, a feted former foreign correspondent and war reporter
who’s been called “the newsroom Dietrich”. She’s visited every city of
importance, from Madrid to Calcutta, has been married thrice, has won the
Pulitzer, and has rubbed shoulders with “a procession of artists, poets,
politicians and Hollywood panjandrums”
-- General Franco, Frank Sinatra, Jean Cocteau and Madame Chiang
Kai-Shek, to name a few. In the other corner is Tamara Sim, a 27-year-old reporter
who works with The Monitor as a
freelance sub editor and writes for Psst!,
the paper’s Saturday celebrity gossip magazine. She’s a repository of show
business trivia, “a grandmistress of gossip” with a knack for “What’s In/What’s
Out, Going Up/Going Down, Good Week/Bad Week” lists.
To
begin with, then, these two come across as archetypes, not as full-fledged characters.
Improbably, Tamara is asked to interview Honor and the meeting – which occurs
after too many pages of backstory – is a clash of opposites. When Honor
mentions T.S. Eliot, Tamara thinks of the West End musical; when she makes a
reference to the Library of Alexandria, the industrious Tamara makes a note:
“Chk: who is Alexandria? What happened to her library?”
Great
fun though this is to read, McAfee’s satirical mask starts to slip as the
coiled plot unfurls. Tamara’s sleuthing turns up revelations that the tabloids
pounce upon and the tone shifts to something darker. This, despite comic set
pieces such as the defining characteristics of those who work in a paper’s
news, sport, books, obit and other sections.
What
colours the book like drops of black ink in clear water is Honor’s later
predicament and her observations on the present. Speaking to Tamara of the rise
in the use of the first person singular, she says, “Isn’t that what all you
young journalists want to talk about these days? Yourselves, your pasts, your
feelings, your relationships.” Reports in the popular press are dismissed as
“imbecilic morality tales for an amoral age”. For an earlier generation, “the
vulgar publicity, the public exposure, brought…by airing family business,
private affairs, in confessional memoirs or newspaper articles would be
completely abhorrent, unthinkable”. (Take that, Facebook.)
The Spoiler,
then, is decidedly uneven in tone, yet worth reading for its enjoyable moments
of high farce and the light it throws on the way we consume what we call “the
news”. Some would dismiss Honor as elitist and hidebound but there’s much truth
to her opinions. At one point, she feels, “The young were all gunslingers now,
each one a little Goebbels, reaching for their revolvers whenever they heard
the word culture”. Ouch.
No comments:
Post a Comment