Today's Sunday Guardian column.
Even
if you aren’t a Salinger fan, you’ve probably heard the news that more of his
books are likely to be published soon, some of them dealing with the further
exploits of Holden Caulfield and the Glass family, as well as musings on
Vedanta. One has mixed feelings about this: elation that there’s going to be
more of his work to read as well as misgivings that his last novels, influenced
so heavily by his religious views, may not be on a par with the rest.
The
information about the forthcoming volumes is contained in a new biography,
simply titled Salinger, by David
Shields and Shane Salerno, a companion piece to the latter’s documentary. Both
are to be released next week. Early reports indicate that the book is a montage
of interviews, newspaper articles, letters and photographs, with the New York Times’ Michiko Kakutani calling
it a “loosey-goosey Internet-age narrative”.
Past
biographies were hamstrung by the unwillingness of the reclusive novelist – and
most of his friends and associates -- to take part in such an enterprise, a
stance he stuck to until his death in 2010. This, of course, didn’t stop people from trying. There was the poorly
received attempt by erstwhile Time
magazine reporter Paul Alexander, for example, as well as the more exhaustive one by Kenneth Slawenski in 2011 that, among other things, threw light on the
writer’s World War II years. (Current speculation is that the horrors Salinger
encountered during that time led to a form of PTSD, because of which he turned
to Eastern religion and a hermit-like life.) Then, there was the self-centred –
some would say self-serving – account by Joyce Maynard, who had a relationship
with Salinger when she was 18; in contrast, Margaret Salinger’s Dream Catcher, about life with her
father, is more honest and revealing of his eccentricities.
The
one book that appeared before all of these, and which created more of a ruckus,
was British journalist Ian Hamilton’s In
Search of J.D. Salinger, published in 1988. This, however, wasn’t the book
that he wanted to write. After Hamilton finished his biography of the writer
who was “famous for not wanting to be famous”, Salinger won a copyright
infringement suit against the publisher as the book quoted liberally from
unpublished letters and short stories. In
Search of J.D. Salinger, then, is
the book that Hamilton was finally able to publish, more an account of how he
went about teasing out information on Salinger than a biography proper. It
often reads like a detective story, with visits to Salinger’s old haunts and
associates to look for clues.
Fascinating
as much of this is to read – it must have been far more so when it first
appeared – there’s always an uneasy sense of voyeurism, of invading the space
of someone who wants to be left alone. This is exacerbated by Hamilton’s treatment:
he sets up a split personality, one of whom “grapples feebly with the moral
issues” and the other a “biographizing alter ego” eager to get on with the job.
A lot of time is taken up with back-and-forth between the two, a device that
soon becomes annoying, if not disingenuous. (“Phony,” one can almost hear
Holden say.)
Hamilton
uncovers traces of Salinger’s public life: “school records, some telling items
of juvenilia, frank testimony from contemporaries, some eyewitness location
stuff”, and pieces together an account of Salinger's early years and how it
reflected in his work. As he himself acknowledges, however, the heart of his
book is without Salinger’s own voice and personality. Later in the book, he
writes: “in the case of J. D. Salinger, [when] the inner life becomes virtually
indistinguishable from any life that we might sensibly call ‘outer,’ then even
the most intrepid chronicler knows himself to be facing an impasse”.
This
seems to be the fate of any such chronicle of “the Greta Garbo of American
letters”, which is why I’m going to stay away from Shields and Salerno’s
biography. As for Salinger’s own posthumous work, that’s a temptation to which
I suspect I’ll succumb.
No comments:
Post a Comment