This appeared in the latest issue of the Sunday Guardian -- although, by mistake, under a different byline.
When
I first read George Eliot's Middlemarch,
the question I asked myself was: what makes it a novel? There's a profusion of
characters of various ages and backgrounds, facing different predicaments, many
of whom never meet, with parallel, sometimes interlocking narrative strands. On
the other hand, if, as the novel's subtitle has it, it's meant to be a study of
English provincial life, why the emphasis on Dorothea Brooke, commonly held to
be the novel's heroine? This reaction
seemed a faint echo of Henry James’ own mixed admiration for the novel: it was “a treasure house of detail”, but “an
indifferent whole”.
One
of the answers to the question of what holds it together, I later realised, is
that of a distinct sensibility. Eliot, with her famous authorial interjections and
empathy for all her characters, was tying the whole together with a magisterial
understanding of what it means to be human, with human yearnings that are satisfied
-- or not.
One
of the satisfactions of reading New
Yorker writer Rebecca Mead's new book on Eliot's novel is that it delves
into this answer, and offers many more besides. My Life in Middlemarch is Mead's investigation into Middlemarch’s origination and
conception, and the ways in which it intersects with her own life. It’s a
beguiling combination of a devoted reader's analysis, explorations into Eliot’s
life and relevant vignettes from Mead’s own experiences. Fittingly, the book’s
structure mirrors Middlemarch itself.
As
Mead reminds us, the novel was an amalgamation of two ideas that Eliot
separately toyed with: the first, a study of provincial manners, and the
second, simply called “Miss Brooke”. Bringing them together, she created a
master-work, a clever inversion of the marriage plot that was “arresting in the
acuteness of its psychological penetration and the snap of its sentences”, with,
as Eliot wrote, “tolerant judgment, pity and sympathy” extended to every
character.
The
most famous thing ever said about Middlemarch
was Virginia Woolf’s observation that it was “one of the few English novels
written for grown-up people”. It’s a statement that Mead unpacks, concluding
that what Woolf meant, perhaps archly, is that it’s for “those who are old
enough to appreciate the artistic representation of failure rather than
success.”
Mead
reads Eliot’s diaries and letters, visits the author’s childhood house and
walks the streets that she herself would have walked, in Coventry, London and
Oxford, among others. She explains the ways in which Eliot’s life shaped her
fiction, and how her fiction shaped her, detailing the effort required for Mary
Ann Evans to turn herself into George Eliot. (She also speculates on the
origins of the characters: were Casaubon and Dorothea based on the Rector of
Lincoln and his wife? How much of Lewes, the man Eliot lived with, was there in
Ladislaw?)
My Life in Middlemarch
is also a paean to re-reading: “The novel opened up to me further every time I went
back to it.” Through episodes from her own life – moving from the provinces to
the city, affairs, marriage, children – Mead highlights how Middlemarch provided revelation at every
stage: “The questions with which George Eliot showed her characters wrestling
would all be mine eventually. How is wisdom to be attained? What are the
satisfactions of personal ambition, and how might they be weighed against ties
and duties to others? What does a good marriage consist of, and what makes a
bad one? What do the young owe the old, and vice versa? What is the proper
foundation of morality?” From an immersive identification with Dorothea, Mead
moves on over the years to appreciate and sympathise with the other characters,
Lydgate, Ladislaw, Rosamond, Fred, Mary and even Casaubon. As she puts it, the
book was reading her as she was reading it.
Mead’s
assessment of this “home epic”, then, shows how Eliot draws us deep into her
fictional panorama and “makes Middlemarchers of us all”. In answering the
question I put when I first read it, it makes me want to return to Middlemarch myself.
1 comment:
It's so true that every reading of Middlemarch is a revelation. Been too long since I last read it, but I'm rather hesitant to pick it up again in my current circumstances and frame of mind.
Because I've begun to feel George Eliot took the easy way out in her plotting to give Dorothea's story a happy ending. Really wish I could ask George Eliot some questions and hear her wise answers!
For instance, what if Causabon had lived another twenty years?
Or what if Dorothea was pregnant and didnt know till after Causobon died - would she still marry Ladislaw and deprive her child of inherited wealth?
Post a Comment