Today's Sunday Guardian column.
The
pair is the primary creative unit, wrote Joshua Wolf Shenk recently in the New York Times. “At its heart, the
creative process itself is about a push and pull between two entities, two
cultures or traditions, or two people, or even a single person
and the voice inside her head.” Many times, one half of the pair goes unacknowledged,
especially in the case of writers and their wives. The obvious examples are
those of Vera Nabokov, Nora Joyce and Zelda Fitzgerald; it’s only of late that their
contributions have been paid attention to, with biographies and fictionalised
accounts of their lives.
Two
recent novels continue such revivification, both dealing with Ernest Hemingway’s
better halves. Paula McLain’s The Paris
Wife revolves around Hemingway’s first, Hadley Richardson, and their time
in Paris, while Naomi Wood’s Mrs
Hemingway encompasses all four of the writer’s wives. The former is more
focused on the ways in which Hadley helped her husband flower as a writer, while
the latter, with its decades-long span, also shows how the significant women in
his life shaped him (and vice versa).
Much
of the charm of The Paris Wife comes
from its evocation of the city in which the 21-year-old Ernest and the
28-year-old Hadley lived during the 1920s: “filthy and gorgeous, full of rats
and horse chestnut blossoms and poetry…The cafés of Montparnasse breathed them
in and out, French painters and Russian dancers and American writers.” Here,
Hemingway was to meet others who influenced him (notably Gertrude Stein), drink
copiously, travel over Europe as a journalist and, of course, start work on the
pared-down short stories and novels he was acclaimed for.
Hadley,
meanwhile, “closer to a Victorian holdout than a flapper”, spent her days
practising the piano, attempting French cooking and occasionally accompanying
him on his jaunts. She’s clear about her role: “It was shockingly unmodern—and
likely naïve, too—but I did believe any sacrifices and difficulties in our life
were worth it for Ernest’s career.” By 1927, however, it all came to an end;
they were divorced after Hemingway’s affair with Vogue journalist Pauline Pfieffer, who became his second wife.
McLain
does provide emotional depth to historical facts, but overall, The Paris Wife could have done with less
sentimentality and overstatement. Naomi Wood’s Mrs Hemingway is more ingenious and artful, both in structure and
in telling. Set in the last weeks of each marriage, it circles back to first
meetings and memories, like a hand of overlapping queens in a deck of cards,
each one coming to terms with loss. Wood’s Hadley has more spirit, as do the
other wives, especially Martha Gellhorn, war reporter and novelist, who at one
point feels that Hemingway “is not so much greedy for women as blind to what he
thinks he needs and so he grabs at everything. Wives and wives and wives…”
Hemingway’s
small apartment above a sawmill in Paris is an important setting in both
novels, and Mrs Hemingway also brings
to life the other locations where his wives nourished and inspired him: the
house in Key West, Florida; the one in FincaVigia, Cuba; and his final home in
Sun Valley, Idaho. Here, Mary Welsh, his last wife, came to grips with his
suicide and later, gathered together his posthumous papers. Among these was the
manuscript for A Moveable Feast, his nostalgic
account of 1920s Paris, thus bringing the saga full circle.
Reviewing
two early biographies of Hemingway, Raymond Carver wrote that one grew weary of
and ultimately saddened by Hemingway’s actions: “one display after another of mean-spiritedness
and spite, of vulgar and shabby behavior”. That reaction, not unmixed with some
sympathy, remains after reading these novels. The antidote, as Carver went on
to suggest, is to re-read his fiction itself: “How clear, serene and solid the
best work still seems”. The Paris Wife
and Mrs Hemingway are necessary reminders
of the women who enabled him to produce such work.
No comments:
Post a Comment