This appeared in today's The Indian Express
On
a December morning in 1986, the ten-year-old Rafia Zakaria’s Aunt Amina left
her husband to return to her parents’ house. This, to the young Zakaria, was
mystifying, until it was explained to her that Uncle Sohail had taken a second
wife. The reveberations of this episode and the context against which they play
out form the driving force behind Zakaria’s The
Upstairs Wife, a domestic memoir of Pakistan that's counter-balanced by
public events.
In
Shame, the novel banned in Pakistan
almost immediately after it was published in 1983, Salman Rushdie writes: “I
had thought, before I began, that what I had on my hands was an almost
excessively masculine tale, a saga of sexual rivalry, ambition, power,
patronage, betrayal, death, revenge.” However, he continues, “the women seem to
have taken over; they marched in from the peripheries of the story to demand
the inclusion of their own tragedies, histories and comedies”. If Shame is set in Rushdie’s “looking-glass
Pakistan”, The Upstairs Wife is
Pakistan-as-jigsaw-puzzle, with many pieces – though not all -- portraying
women’s tragedies, histories and comedies.
The
book moves backward and forward from 1986 in an ambitious attempt to capture
Pakistan’s “intimate history”.There are vignettes to do with the lives of
Zakaria’s grandparents in undivided India: Konkani Muslims living in the shadow
of Mumbai’s Jamia Milla Mosque, they stay on after Partition, changing their
minds and arriving in Karachi only in 1961. There’s the saga of Aunt Amina who
returns to her husband and his second wife: she lives on an upper floor, with
Uncle Sohail’s time equally divided between one and then the other. There are
mini-portrayals of other members of the family: the author’s mother, for
instance, who is determined to provide her children with an education.
Interwoven
with these are observations on historical events, notably, the assassination of
Benazir Bhutto, which forms the book's prologue. Other pieces of the jigsaw
that make up this portrait of Pakistan feature the Bangladesh War, the effects
of the Islamic policies of Zia ul-Haq, the struggles between the muhajirs and
other communities, and the fallout of happenings in Afghanistan over the years.
A lot for any place to endure.
It’s
an approach that works well when there’s a resonance between the private and
public. The day of Benazir Bhutto’s killing, for example, is also the day that
Uncle Sohail is in hospital after suffering a stroke. As Zakaria writes: “For
one odd, brief, and singular moment, the catastrophes of my family and my
country had come together, showing me how they were woven together, knotted and
inextricable, inside and outside, male and female, no longer separate.”
At
times, though, the links seem forced: “One year after Uncle Sohail took a
second wife, another strange wedding took place in Karachi [that of Benazir
Bhutto with Ali Asaf Zardari]”. At yet other times, the connections are
tenuous, especially as many pieces of this jigsaw aren’t specifically about
women’s lives. This can give The Upstairs
Wife, deeply-felt and keenly-observed though it is, something of a fragmentary
character.
Journalistic
set pieces or otherwise, Zakaria’s slices of life in Pakistan are always
revealing. There is, for example, the delicious tale of how Hamida Bogra, wife
of Mohammad Ali Bogra, third Prime Minister of Pakistan, started a campaign for
women’s rights after her husband fell in love with his secretary, resulting in
the country’s Muslim Family Law Ordinance. Pages and years later, there’s the
moving account of Shaheeda Parveen, sentenced to be stoned to death because her
previous husband alleged that he had never really divorced her.
The
significance of The Upstairs Wife
also lies in its portrayal of the quotidian in the face of the uncertain.
“There was the outing to the beach disrupted by the kidnapping of a friend’s
father,” the author recollects, “the concert that concluded a half hour after
it began because of a bomb threat; the exams carefully prepared for again and
again and again only to be put off due to curfews and killings and strikes and
sit-ins”. Here, as elsewhere, Zakaria demonstrates how public events shape private
lives. Individuals may change history, but more often than not, it’s the other
way around.
No comments:
Post a Comment